One front door
Users and administrators start with the contracted Temen channel instead of guessing which platform or provider owns the failure.
Temen gives users, administrators, cloud teams, and AI owners one accountable support relationship for the Microsoft services and production workloads included in their agreement.
18 affected users across three regions. Email and Teams access unavailable.
A single business issue can cross a user, identity policy, Microsoft 365 service, Azure workload, application dependency, license, and AI workflow. The technical boundary is rarely obvious when the case begins.
Temen owns intake and customer communication, organizes the evidence, coordinates the right resources, and keeps responsibility visible through resolution and review.
Users and administrators start with the contracted Temen channel instead of guessing which platform or provider owns the failure.
Business impact, affected scope, recent change, evidence, entitlement, and urgency shape the response before the case is routed.
Technical work can cross multiple resources without forcing the customer to rebuild the timeline or chase separate updates.
Recurring problems, supportability gaps, declined actions, and separately scoped improvements remain visible after service returns.
Each support family can stand alone. Combined support becomes valuable when Microsoft 365 and Azure both matter and one coordinated relationship is more important than separate queues.
BEST FITUsers, administrators, identities, collaboration, devices, and Microsoft security services.
BEST FITCloud administrators, applications, infrastructure, data, connectivity, recovery, and platform operations.
BEST FITOrganizations where Microsoft 365 and Azure are both material and fragmented ownership is the problem.
BEST FITCopilot agents, Microsoft Foundry workloads, and related production AI workflows.
Ticket count alone cannot describe support demand. Users, tenants, subscriptions, workloads, service hours, business impact, inherited risk, and governance determine the actual service.
Microsoft 365 support and a material Azure footprint need one accountable relationship with workload coverage.
Change the case, inspect every checkpoint, and see which evidence keeps Microsoft 365, Azure, and production AI support from becoming a loose handoff.
Eighteen remote users cannot reach email or Teams. Executives are affected and no safe workaround is confirmed.
Confirm affected users, locations, authentication method, start time, service health, recent changes, and an authorized customer contact.
These prices are starting points or monthly minimums, not automatic quotes. Temen validates the environment, demand, service hours, risk, included capacity, and governance before issuing a final proposal.
Review commercial boundariesChoose by user and administrator needs, workload breadth, support demand, tenant complexity, and required review.
Smaller teams with lighter support needs.
Core user, license, password, role, access, Exchange, and Teams support.
Request fit reviewMid-market teams needing accountable support.
Support across Exchange, Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive, Intune, Defender, and Entra ID.
Request fit reviewBroader environments that need recurring review.
Expanded coverage with monthly service review, support analytics, readiness, and license hygiene.
Request fit reviewMultiple tenants, domains, complex governance, or high support demand.
A tailored support and governance model aligned to the operating environment.
Request fit reviewCoordination is intentionally lighter than full tenant or workload support. Production criticality changes the required operating posture.
Light Azure use or occasional coordination.
Issue intake, routing, basic triage, and eligible escalation coordination.
Request fit reviewOne tenant with normal support demand.
Accountable support for subscriptions, core services, backup, recovery, and identity-related issues.
Request fit reviewProduction environments and material workloads.
Priority support across networking, compute, data, applications, and recovery.
Request fit reviewMulti-subscription or higher-complexity Azure estates.
A tailored support and governance model shaped around platform and workload complexity.
Request fit reviewCombined support reduces the work of coordinating users, tenant services, Azure operations, escalations, and recurring governance.
Smaller organizations with lighter cloud needs.
Core Microsoft 365 user and access support with Azure intake and coordination when applicable.
Request fit reviewMost mid-market Microsoft cloud environments.
Accountable Microsoft 365 support, ticket handling, cloud escalation, and Azure coordination.
Request fit reviewOrganizations with a material Azure footprint.
Managed Microsoft support plus Azure tenant and workload coverage.
Request fit reviewLarge or high-complexity Microsoft environments.
A tailored support, governance, and escalation model across the Microsoft cloud.
Request fit reviewWorkload count, architecture, integrations, business impact, telemetry, usage, and complexity determine final AI maintenance scope.
A standard workload needing a defined reactive path.
Reactive support, monthly health review, minor prompt revisions, basic workflow corrections, two engineering hours, and a brief summary.
Request fit reviewImportant production workflows needing active care.
Proactive monitoring, prompt tuning, workflow maintenance, biweekly health review, five engineering hours, and monthly recommendations.
Request fit reviewBusiness-critical or customer-facing production AI.
Enhanced oversight, active optimization, weekly review, ten engineering hours, and executive and technical reporting.
Request fit reviewMicrosoft licensing, Azure consumption, model and token use, voice, storage, search, connectors, third-party services, migrations, architecture, deployments, remediation, substantial redesign, new AI workloads, and project work are separate unless the signed agreement expressly includes them.
Severity is not a shortcut for bypassing evidence. Temen validates impact, affected scope, workaround, production criticality, recent change, and entitlement before confirming the operating posture.
Widespread or material production impact without a reasonable workaround.
Critical triage and eligible escalation under the contracted terms.
Major degradation or an important unavailable function.
Priority troubleshooting, coordination, communication, and eligible escalation.
Limited-impact incident, question, request, or routine issue.
Normal support workflow according to the selected plan and service hours.
Eligible plans include Sev A and Sev B escalation paths. For a qualifying critical incident, Temen may coordinate access to a Microsoft Critical Situation manager when required and permitted by the customer's Microsoft support entitlement and Microsoft's qualification process.
Temen can commit to its contracted intake, communication, coordination, and response posture. Microsoft controls escalation acceptance, resource availability, and resolution timing.
A clear boundary protects both speed and trust. Temen classifies the request before separately billed work begins and obtains approval when the outcome or system boundary changes.
Troubleshooting, incident handling, covered user or workload assistance, eligible escalation, communication, and verification inside the agreement.
Routine or limited administration may be included when the package and order form explicitly define the task, authority, and capacity.
A controlled adjustment that changes configuration, policy, workflow, operating behavior, or included capacity and needs impact review and approval.
Migrations, architecture, deployments, remediation programs, substantial redesign, custom development, and new workloads are separately scoped.
Inherited environments begin with evidence, not optimistic assumptions. Access, documentation, licensing, monitoring, known risk, configuration, security, and dependencies determine what can be supported immediately.
Any prerequisite remediation stays visible and is approved separately before it quietly becomes part of recurring support.
Confirm the service family, package, users, tenants, subscriptions, workloads, hours, reporting, price, term, and exclusions.
Establish authorized contacts, least-privilege access, support channels, ticket routing, escalation references, and communication expectations.
Inventory covered services, dependencies, known issues, telemetry, consumption, documentation, and supportability risks.
Test case intake, confirm communications, validate the operating runbook, and authorize service commencement.
Track early demand, recurring problems, inherited risk, separate remediation, and the first contracted service review.
Higher plans add health review, analytics, readiness, license hygiene, tuning, reporting, and recommendations so recurring incidents become visible decisions.
Entitlement, scope, severity, evidence, owner, customer update, next action, and verified closeout.
Demand, incident trends, recurring problems, covered environment health, included capacity, and recommendations.
Production AI health, failed runs, tuning needs, workflow maintenance, usage, and operational recommendations.
Enhanced oversight for critical AI workloads, active optimization, business risk, and technical performance.
Users, tenants, workloads, ticket demand, severity, capacity use, environment growth, and package fit.
Yes. Microsoft 365, Azure, combined Microsoft support, and Managed Agentic Systems can each be scoped independently.
No. They are starting points or minimums. Temen validates users, tenants, subscriptions, workloads, consumption, service hours, demand, business impact, and complexity before issuing a proposal.
No. Support hours and after-hours coverage depend on the selected plan and signed agreement. Nonstandard coverage or response commitments must be approved explicitly.
Often, yes. Inherited environments normally require an assessment. Documentation, security, monitoring, access, configuration, or remediation gaps may need to be resolved before full activation.
Eligible plans include Microsoft escalation paths. Escalation depends on the affected service, customer entitlement, incident evidence, Microsoft eligibility, and the Temen agreement.
No. For qualifying critical incidents, Temen may coordinate access when required and permitted by the customer's Microsoft entitlement and Microsoft's qualification process. Microsoft controls acceptance, staffing, and resolution timing.
No, unless the agreement explicitly says otherwise. Microsoft licensing, Azure consumption, model and token use, voice, storage, search, connectors, and third-party services remain separate.
Temen prices production AI by workload and complexity, not only by the number of visible agents. Architecture, departments, channels, data boundaries, business criticality, and workflow breadth affect the count.
Unless the agreement expressly says otherwise, included engineering hours are monthly capacity and expire at month end. Additional work requires approval.
No. Temen maintains and improves the system within the agreed scope, but AI output varies and requires appropriate customer oversight.
Bring the users, tenants, subscriptions, workloads, production AI systems, current support path, service hours, incident concerns, and recurring pain. Temen will recommend the appropriate starting plan and validate the scope before proposing commercial terms.